New Climate Package in Germany - Can it Deliver?
Today a new climate package has been released in Germany. In the build-up to the event all major politicians of the country called this the `make-or-break` point of German climate policy. For years Germany failed to meet its climate objectives and is sure to miss its greenhouse gas emission targets for 2020. Especially the transport and the heating sectors do not deliver. So which implementation measures to reach Germany`s climate goals are envisaged? And why took more than 1 million people in Germany to the streets (`climate strike`) in protest?
54 billion Euros until 2030 shall be paid out by the German government to ensure that the country reaches its climate targets of 40 % greenhouse gas reduction compared to 1990 levels in sectors covered by the European Emission Trading scheme (EU ETS) and 38 % reduction compared to 2005 levels in non-EU ETS sectors. These are namely transport and heating.
Today`s climate package is a hotchpotch of several measures, which may be clustered into four points, discussed below, before the criticism of the package is being discussed:
Criticism and Anger
While the climate package, which shall now be put into laws until the end of this year, was promulgated, more than 1 million people took to the streets in Germany to protest against the package in a day of `climate strike´. The package is under heavy criticism as `too little and much too late´. While the government pledged that the measures and their implementation would be closely monitored on a yearly basis, protesters, NGOs but also scientists and politicians are sceptical that no real system change is taking place. Subsidies for coal and gas remain largely untouched. For oil the system is inconsistent: while on the one hand subsides for oil remain in place, taxes on gasoline, on the other hand, shall increase, obscuring possible steering effects. Moreover, the fundamental decision to change the German renewable energy support system from a feed-in tariff model to a tendering model is not revised, despite mounting evidence that the tendering model is not working well. This is also due to European legislation, which pushed hard for the introduction of tenders for renewable energy subsidies in all Member States. But critics ponder that a major country like Germany should, nonetheless, be able to insist on the feed-in model. The climate package could, overall, be viewed as an abdication of Germany as world leader in climate policy.
54 billion Euros until 2030 shall be paid out by the German government to ensure that the country reaches its climate targets of 40 % greenhouse gas reduction compared to 1990 levels in sectors covered by the European Emission Trading scheme (EU ETS) and 38 % reduction compared to 2005 levels in non-EU ETS sectors. These are namely transport and heating.
Today`s climate package is a hotchpotch of several measures, which may be clustered into four points, discussed below, before the criticism of the package is being discussed:
- Emissions Trading Scheme
- Transport and Heating
- Renewable Energy
- Electricity Storage and Hydrogen Infrastructure
Criticism and Anger
While the climate package, which shall now be put into laws until the end of this year, was promulgated, more than 1 million people took to the streets in Germany to protest against the package in a day of `climate strike´. The package is under heavy criticism as `too little and much too late´. While the government pledged that the measures and their implementation would be closely monitored on a yearly basis, protesters, NGOs but also scientists and politicians are sceptical that no real system change is taking place. Subsidies for coal and gas remain largely untouched. For oil the system is inconsistent: while on the one hand subsides for oil remain in place, taxes on gasoline, on the other hand, shall increase, obscuring possible steering effects. Moreover, the fundamental decision to change the German renewable energy support system from a feed-in tariff model to a tendering model is not revised, despite mounting evidence that the tendering model is not working well. This is also due to European legislation, which pushed hard for the introduction of tenders for renewable energy subsidies in all Member States. But critics ponder that a major country like Germany should, nonetheless, be able to insist on the feed-in model. The climate package could, overall, be viewed as an abdication of Germany as world leader in climate policy.
Comments
Post a Comment